Re: [DNA-BOF] Re: [mobile-ip] Announce: BoF Proposal: DetectingNetwork Attachment

[gabriel montenegro <gab@sun.com>]

Bernard Aboba wrote:
>>IETF. In this sense it is  a problem asking for a BoF.
>>The v4 aspect side of things would be a BoF asking for
>>a problem.
> 
> 
> We've just gone through a discussion of the IPv4 issues in
> ZEROCONF and decided that rather than covering this in the IPv4LL draft
> we would write a separate document on the subject of IPv4 movement
> detection (that's how the draft got started), at Thomas Narten's
> request.

Ok, I see it is justified by some work already.
Thanks for the clarification.

I just re-read Greg's message, and agree that having a joint
v4/v6 BoF need not imply a similar partnering for a subsequent
WG. Fair enough.

tnx,

-gabriel