Re: [DNA-BOF] Potential Workplan for comment

[Alper Yegin <alper@docomolabs-usa.com>]

>>>     * Investigate problem space for DNA for IPv4, Recommend for or
>>> against IPv4 DNA
>>>           o by IETF 58
>> 
>> 
>> DNA is already part of RFC 2131 and the LLv4 specification so I think
>> we're beyond this now.  The question is whether those specifications are
>> in need of revision.

How about Mobile IPv4 access networks where neither LLv4 nor DHCP is used
(think FA-located care-of address case)? I think we need to handle this case
as well to complete the IPv4 scenarios.


>> 
>> Since RFC 2131 is owned by the DHC WG, we're going to be discussing the
>> IPv4 DNA draft there, and if it is accepted as a WG work item, I presume
>> that the work will be done there.
>> 
>> As a result, there's not really a need for "defining requirements" or
>> "scope" of IPv4 DNA.

Alper