[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [DNA-BOF] About Charter, DAD, and SEND

To: dna@eng.monash.edu.au
Subject: Re: [DNA-BOF] About Charter, DAD, and SEND
From: "Nick 'Sharkey' Moore" <sharkey@zoic.org>
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 16:04:26 +1000
Cc: Pekka Nikander <pekka.nikander@nomadiclab.com>
In-reply-to: <3F5353A2.9060506@nomadiclab.com>
References: <3F45A65A.7080204@eng.monash.edu.au><3F5353A2.9060506@nomadiclab.com>
Sender: owner-dna@ecselists.eng.monash.edu.au
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i

On 2003-09-01, Pekka Nikander wrote:
> 
> I would also add two requirements/goals:
> 
>   3.N  Interoperability with SEND
>    The optimized DAD mechanism SHOULD work when SEND is used.
>    It is desirable that the SEND and DAD optimization work
>    are closely coordinated so that it DAD optimization could
>    benefit from SEND and vice versa.

Yeah, I'd really like to get Optimistic DAD working with SEND.
It's compatible with CGAs, but presumably the signalling needs
some SENDy tweaks.  Let me know what you think.

-----Nick

References:
- [DNA-BOF] About Charter, DAD, and SEND
  - From: Pekka Nikander <pekka.nikander@nomadiclab.com>

Prev by Date: [DNA-BOF] Do we need a separate DAD Problem Statement? (was Re: About Charter,DAD, and SEND)
Next by Date: [DNA-BOF] Re: =?EUC-KR?B?PyBSZSA6UmU6IFtETkEtQk9GXSBEQUQgT3B0aW1pemF0aW9uIA==?==?EUC-KR?B?UHJvYmxlbSBTdGF0ZW1lbnQgICAgICAgIENIT0lKSU5IWUVPQ0sgICAgICAgaQ==?==?EUC-KR?B?X05ldHdvcmtpbmcgTGFiIFNhbXN1bmcgQWR2YW5jZWQgSW5zdGl0dXRlIG9mIA==?==?EUC-KR?B?VGVjaG5vbG9neVJlc2VhcmNoZXI=?=
Prev by thread: Re: Use cases for optimized DAD (was Re: [DNA-BOF] Do we need aseparate DAD Problem Statement?)
Next by thread: Re: [DNA-BOF] About Charter, DAD, and SEND
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread