RE: [DNA-BOF] draft-moore-optimistic-dad-03.txt

[Soohong Daniel Park <soohong.park@samsung.com>]

Hi Nick

oDAD-03 looks good and I have a question as follows.


>An optimized DAD method needs to:

   * remove the RETRANS_TIMER delay during address configuration.


In my opinion, above mention is not optimized DAD but omited DAD and
I don't make sense what optimized DAD means in this draft without
definitions. Also this work is not compatible with the concept of oDAD.

Could you let me know your view on this ?

Daniel 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dna@ecselists.eng.monash.edu.au 
> [mailto:owner-dna@ecselists.eng.monash.edu.au] On Behalf Of 
> Nick 'Sharkey' Moore
> Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 2:32 PM
> To: mobile-ip@sunroof.eng.sun.com; dna@eng.monash.edu.au
> Subject: [DNA-BOF] draft-moore-optimistic-dad-03.txt
> 
> 
> G'day all,
> 
> 	well, I've finally gotten around to updating the
> Optimistic DAD draft to -03.  It's really just a few tweaks 
> to the rules, but I've also added a mini problem statement 
> just to clarify what I think the problems of standard DAD are.
> 
> 	It should, nits willing, appear on the archives soon,
> but in the meantime you can grab it fresh from: 
> <http://bluesky.zoic.org/sharkey/draft-moore-ipv6-optimistic-d
ad-03.txt>

	Let me know what you think -- it's only 13 honest pages,
so it shouldn't take too long!  I'd really like to get
an informed discussion going about this at IETF 58.

-----Nick