[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [mobile-ip] RE: [DNA-BOF] draft-moore-optimistic-dad-03.txt

To: Soohong Daniel Park <soohong.park@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [mobile-ip] RE: [DNA-BOF] draft-moore-optimistic-dad-03.txt
From: "Nick 'Sharkey' Moore" <sharkey@zoic.org>
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 18:23:23 +1000
Cc: mobile-ip@sunroof.eng.sun.com, dna@eng.monash.edu.au
In-reply-to: <003a01c375de$b6c30710$b7cbdba8@daniel>
Mail-followup-to: Soohong Daniel Park <soohong.park@samsung.com>,mobile-ip@sunroof.eng.sun.com, dna@eng.monash.edu.au
References: <20030908053225.GA21191@zoic.org><003a01c375de$b6c30710$b7cbdba8@daniel>
Sender: owner-dna@ecselists.eng.monash.edu.au
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i

On 2003-09-08, Soohong Daniel Park wrote:
> [draft-moore-ipv6-optimistic-dad-03.txt]
> >An optimized DAD method needs to:
> >   * remove the RETRANS_TIMER delay during address configuration.
> 
> In my opinion, above mention is not optimized DAD but omited DAD and
> I don't make sense what optimized DAD means in this draft without
> definitions. Also this work is not compatible with the concept of oDAD.

What I mean by that is that the delay in address configuration 
caused by RETRANS_TIMER must be removed. 

Optimistically configured addresses still stay Tentative for at 
least RETRANS_TIMER, but their use is not _delayed_ by this.
They can be used while still Tentative.

I hope that clarifies things!

cheers,
-----Nick

References:
- [DNA-BOF] draft-moore-optimistic-dad-03.txt
  - From: "Nick 'Sharkey' Moore" <sharkey@zoic.org>
- RE: [DNA-BOF] draft-moore-optimistic-dad-03.txt
  - From: Soohong Daniel Park <soohong.park@samsung.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [DNA-BOF] draft-moore-optimistic-dad-03.txt
Next by Date: Re: [DNA-BOF] Re: Do we need a separate DAD Problem Statement? (wasRe: About Charter, DAD, and SEND)
Prev by thread: RE: [DNA-BOF] draft-moore-optimistic-dad-03.txt
Next by thread: Re: [DNA-BOF] draft-moore-optimistic-dad-03.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread