[DNA-BOF] =?utf-8?Q?Re:_=5BDNA-BOF=5D_=3FRe_:Re:_=5BDNA-BOF=5D?==?utf-8?Q?_Draft_charter_now_online_______?==?utf-8?Q?___________=EC=B5=9C=EC=A7=84=ED=98=81______________i=5FNe?==?utf-8?Q?tworking=5FLAB____________________?==?utf-8?Q?____=EC=82=BC=EC=84=B1=EC=A2=85=ED=95=A9?==?utf-8?Q?=EA=B8=B0=EC=88=A0=EC=9B=90______________________?==?utf-8?Q?____=EC=A0=84=EB=AC=B8=EC=97=B0=EA=B5=AC=EC=9B=90__________?=

[Spencer Dawkins <spencer@mcsr-labs.org>]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "최진혁" <jinchoe@samsung.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 9:04 AM
Subject: [DNA-BOF] ?Re :Re: [DNA-BOF] Draft charter now online 최진혁
i_Networking_LAB 삼성종합기술원 전문연구원


> Hi Greg
>
> Greg Daley Wrote:

> >
> > I agree generally that this is the goal, though I get very
> > wary about providing the wrong impression when people start
> > talking about 'IP Connection'.
> >
> > It's a Connectionless medium.
>
> I see. What I mean by IP connection is like this.
>
> A node has an IP Connection if it can send and receive IP packets
with
> any other node in Internet.
>
> But if the term connection gives the wrong impression, we'd better
find
> a better phrase.

Dear JinChoe,

Re: choice of phrase, perhaps an "IP Network Attachment"?

Re: meaning of phrase, I'm still confused on where DNA is between
"send and receive IP packets with *any* other node" and "send and
receive IP packets with *at least one* other node". I've seen postings
saying that if we can only send IP packets to an authentication
server, we *are* connected/attached, and I've seen postings saying
that we *are not* connected/attached. Is this something we have
consensus on yet?

Spencer