Re: [DNA-BOF] Draft charter now online

[CHOIJINHYEOCK <jinchoe@samsung.com>]

Dear Spencer 

> Re: choice of phrase, perhaps an "IP Network Attachment"?

I guess that Attachment is better than Connection.  
 
> Re: meaning of phrase, I'm still confused on where DNA is between
> "send and receive IP packets with *any* other node" and "send and
> receive IP packets with *at least one* other node". I've seen postings
> saying that if we can only send IP packets to an authentication
> server, we *are* connected/attached, and I've seen postings saying
> that we *are not* connected/attached. Is this something we have
> consensus on yet?

You catch me at the weak spot. :-). I still don's have clear idea how
we incorporate Authentication part into DNA work. 

IHMO, to be called attached, at least, a node should have a global IP 
address, a default router and other per interface parameters in RA, 
for example, link MTU, Reachable Time et cetra. 

Best regards

JinHyeock