Re: [DNA-BOF] =?EUC-KR?B?P1JlIDpSZTogW0ROQS1CT0ZdIERyYWZ0IGNoYXJ0?==?EUC-KR?B?ZXIgbm93IG9ubGluZSAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIMPWwfjH9SAgICAgICAgIA==?==?EUC-KR?B?ICAgICBpX05ldHdvcmtpbmdfTEFCICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgu+8=?==?EUC-KR?B?vLrBvsfVseK8+r/4ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICDA/Lmuv6yxuA==?==?EUC-KR?B?v/gg?=

[Greg Daley <greg.daley@eng.monash.edu.au>]

Hi JinHyeock,


ÃÖÁøÇõ wrote:
[cut]
>>>Hence, the node has to detect whether it has IP layer connection or not. And
>>>if not, it has to gather the necessary information to set up a new IP layer 
>>>connection to a new IP subent. Which is generally getting a right RA.  
>>
>>I agree generally that this is the goal, though I get very
>>wary about providing the wrong impression when people start
>>talking about 'IP Connection'.
>>
>>It's a Connectionless medium.
> 
> 
> I see. What I mean by IP connection is like this. 
> 
> A node has an IP Connection if it can send and receive IP packets with 
> any other node in Internet. 
> 
> But if the term connection gives the wrong impression, we'd better find 
> a better phrase. 

It may sound like pedantry, but I think that
IP Connectivity (the possibility to connect using IP)
is more accurate than an IP Connection.

Greg