[DNA-BOF] Re: Comment required: Goals or Requirements for DAD Optimization ?

[Greg Daley <greg.daley@eng.monash.edu.au>]

Hi Daniel,

Soohong Daniel Park wrote:
> Hi all
> 
> After Greg's below mail, I can not find out any comments without Pekka.
> 
> What do you think about Problem Statements, Goals or Requirements 
> for DAD Optimization ?

With no hat on, I guess that it may be OK to
combine them.

I think that if the same people are working on them
anyway, and the problem statement is short then they
should go together.

> Let me know DNA consensus / decision toward next step.

I'd be interested in seeing what others say too.

Greg

> 
> Daniel
> 
> =========================================
> 
> 
>>Pekka suggested that we may want to have a DAD Optimization
>>Goals document which combines problem statements and
>>goals(requirements)?
>>
>>One of the cited reasons was the well defined nature of
>>this task.
>>
>>What do people think about this?
> 
> 
> 
>>DO people think that DAD Optimization problem statements and 
>>goals/requirements should be separate there?
>>
>>Do people think we should change the DAD Optimization requirements 
>>documents in the charter work list to goals?
> 
>