RE: [DNA-BOF] [Announce] DNA in IPv6 Problem Statement ID

[Soohong Daniel Park <soohong.park@samsung.com>]

Hello Jinhyeock and Greg.

After glancing, I wrote some comment that is a bit
more straightforward...:-)


Overall is good.

Most of all, my understanding is that this document (problem statements)
will be referred to as a basis to several solution document. So it
should
address some possible alternative or solution in this document, of
course
it is a small text for each, and solution document will address these
more detail...

Unclear Boundary (can be solved by link supporting)
No transitivity (L bit is off ?)
Link local scope of Router Address (R bit in Modified Prefix Information
option)
Omission of Prefix Information Option (RS/RA exchange)

Then we can clarify possible solution either basic DNA scheme or
Optimized DNA scheme.

>5.3 Time delay
I agree with your definition however I guess this problem should be
devided into both a host perspective and a router perspective.
After then we can definitely propose reasonable solutions to meet with 
each perspective.

For example:
a host perspective: DAD delay, random delay, waiting time for RA, link
up delay.
a router perspective: random delay, unsolicited RA interval.

Possible solutions:
a host perspective: optimized DAD, random delay=0, reducing waiting time
for RA, trigger method...
a router perspective: fast RA, minimized unsolicited RA interval...





Regards

Daniel (Soohong Daniel Park)
Mobile Platform Laboratory, SAMSUNG Electronics