Re: [DNA-BOF] review of draft-park-dna-ipv6dadopt-requirement-01.txt

[Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@kolumbus.fi>]

Thanks for your reply. A few minor discussion
points inline:

Soohong Daniel Park wrote:

> Well. why do you suggest *10ms* value ? I am not sure it
> should be added into requirements.

Well, obviously you can pick any other number too. Or
relate it to the RTT on the link, or something. My point
was that it would be good to have some sort of a goal.
I mean, isn't this the *primary* requirement ;-)

>>   It may also be an idea to think about RQ1-4 again
>>   and see if we can find a shorter or more fundamental
>>   requirement relating to the backwards compatibility with
>>   regular DAD.
> 
> 
> I will do it after discussing in the mailing list, but I modified
> RQ1 as *Backwards Compatibility with Original DAD*

Sounds good.

And N times:

> done

Great, thanks!

--Jari