[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [DNA-BOF] Revised WG Charter

To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@kolumbus.fi>, greg.daley@eng.monash.edu.au
Subject: Re: [DNA-BOF] Revised WG Charter
From: Alper Yegin <alper@docomolabs-usa.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 13:57:21 -0800
Cc: dna@eng.monash.edu.au, "Pekka.Nikander" <Pekka.Nikander@nomadiclab.com>
In-reply-to: <3FE7F015.7000503@kolumbus.fi>
Sender: owner-dna@ecselists.eng.monash.edu.au

On 12/22/03 11:34 PM, "Jari Arkko" <jari.arkko@kolumbus.fi> wrote:

>> The DNA WG will not provide explicit directions to
>> implementors about datalink layer issues.

The following draft, now a BCP, seems like where we could record the
knowledge we'd gain in this WG:

draft-ietf-pilc-link-design-15.txt

Alper

Follow-Ups:
- Pilc link design document (was: Re: [DNA-BOF] Revised WG Charter)
  - From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@kolumbus.fi>

Prev by Date: RE: [DNA-BOF] Modified Charter available.
Next by Date: [DNA-BOF] Replacement term for L3 Link?
Prev by thread: Re: [DNA-BOF] Revised WG Charter
Next by thread: Pilc link design document (was: Re: [DNA-BOF] Revised WG Charter)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread