[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[DNA] RE: [DNA-BOF] WG Action: Detecting Network Attachment (dna)

To: dna@eng.monash.edu.au, "'Pekka Nikander'" <Pekka.Nikander@nomadiclab.com>, "'Greg Daley'" <greg.daley@eng.monash.edu.au>
Subject: [DNA] RE: [DNA-BOF] WG Action: Detecting Network Attachment (dna)
From: "S. Daniel Park" <soohong.park@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 09:23:44 +0900
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <200402112157.QAA00729@ietf.org>
Sender: owner-dna@ecselists.eng.monash.edu.au


Congratulations on DNA WG !


>       * Develop a DAD optimization protocol, independent
>           of link layer (L2) technology.


I am not sure why we see above item in current charter.
Don't we need to remove it ? What did DNA have in mind ?
Sorry if I lost track of any point...


Daniel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [DNA] RE: [DNA-BOF] WG Action: Detecting Network Attachment (dna)
  - From: Greg Daley <greg.daley@eng.monash.edu.au>

References:
- [DNA-BOF] WG Action: Detecting Network Attachment (dna)
  - From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>

Prev by Date: [DNA-BOF] WG Action: Detecting Network Attachment (dna)
Next by Date: Re: [DNA] RE: [DNA-BOF] WG Action: Detecting Network Attachment (dna)
Prev by thread: [DNA-BOF] WG Action: Detecting Network Attachment (dna)
Next by thread: Re: [DNA] RE: [DNA-BOF] WG Action: Detecting Network Attachment (dna)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread