[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [DNA] L2 link and L3 link
Hi JinHyeock,
BTW: Greg, I and a few others have worked
on a rouch cut at a terminology draft. It
was submitted a few weeks back.
Carl
Original Message:
-----------------
From: JinHyeock Choi athene@sait.samsung.co.kr
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 19:31:18 +0900
To: alper@docomolabs-usa.com, Greg.Daley@eng.monash.edu.au,
dna@eng.monash.edu.au
Subject: [DNA] L2 link and L3 link
I think we'd better clarify the definition of 'link'.
The current definition of 'link' has room for ambiguity. For example, it's
not clear what it means to say that 'two hosts are at the same link'.
There is subtle difference between L2 link and L3 link.
If several Ethernet segments are bridged together, they form a link. If a
host
moves from one Ethernet segment to the another, it hardly notice a change.
There is little need to differentiate L2 link and L3 link.
But if 802.11 APs and an Ethernet segment are bridged to form a link, it's
more complex. Assume there are two APs and a router on an Ethernet
segment as below.
+----+
| AR |
+----+
|
+-----+--------+
| |
+----+ +----+
|AP 1| |AP 2|
+----+ +----+
+----+ +----+
| H 1| |H 2|
+----+ +----+
Each AP forms a different BSS. And if a host moves from AP1 to AP2, it will
detect distinct link-layer change.
Also assume host 1 is attached to AP1 and host 2 is attached to AP2. I
think
it's reasonable to say that they are at the different L2 link. But they are
at the
same (L3) link.
So currently there are ambiguities. Sometimes a person write that 'A host
changed
a link' even when a host only has changed its AP and still remains at the
same
link/ subnet.
We'd better clarify this lest there should be unnecessary confusion and
arguments.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .