RE: [DNA] L2 link and L3 link

["S. Daniel Park" <soohong.park@samsung.com>]

> When PPP is used, usually the IP address is configured as part of the
> link establishment. In that case, as soon as link is up, there isn't
> really much left for DNA to worry about. Please see the dna-l2-hints
> draft. We covered this with the 3gpp2 architecture.

Exactly, no DNA issue is there...also as recommended
in 3314 an entire /64 is assigned to a mobile's connection
so DAD is not useful...

3GPP case would actually be in favour of disabling DAD.


- Daniel (Soohong Daniel Park)
- Mobile Platform Laboratory, SAMSUNG Electronics. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dna@ecselists.eng.monash.edu.au 
> [mailto:owner-dna@ecselists.eng.monash.edu.au] On Behalf Of 
> Alper Yegin
> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 3:21 PM
> To: greg.daley@eng.monash.edu.au; 'JinHyeock Choi'
> Cc: 'Bernard Aboba'; dna@eng.monash.edu.au
> Subject: RE: [DNA] L2 link and L3 link
> 
> 
> Greg,
> 
> > As an aside, It's interesting that Bernard mentioned PPPoE.
> > 
> > PPPoE is inherently an L2 mechanism but defined by IETF.
> > 
> > Do L3 DNA procedures apply here?
> > 
> > It may be that there's no L3 router advertised on the 'Ethernet'
> > link. So existing router discovery procedures don't necessarily
> > apply.
> > 
> > Should we rely on PADI messages to determine reachability,
> > and then provide (authoritative) link hints when IP6CP
> > has gone to open state?
> 

> Alper
> 
> 
>