Re: [DNA] Best current practice for DNA

[Youn-Hee Han <yhhan@thinkonweb.com>]

Hi Greg,

I think that we first should be reminded of what BCP is.
According to RFC2026, BCP is defined as follows:

   The BCP subseries of the RFC series is designed to be a way to
   standardize practices and the results of community deliberations.  A
   BCP document is subject to the same basic set of procedures as
   standards track documents and thus is a vehicle by which the IETF
   community can define and ratify the community's best current thinking
   on a statement of principle or on what is believed to be the best way
   to perform some operations or IETF process function.

And, we can find RFC1818 which specifies why do we need a BCP 
document and how to process BCP into RFC.

For BCP for DNA, IMO, we should make a guideline for DNA
just by using the existing standards, such as RFC2461 and MIPv6-24.
So, I'd like to again introduce our work as follows:

http://www.thinkonweb.com/sait/MD.pdf

Although it is not enough, it can be a stating point material 
for discussion, I think.

Welcome any comments and discussion about this work 
in this IETF meeting place

- YH

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gregory Daley" <Greg.Daley@eng.monash.edu.au>
To: <dna@eng.monash.edu.au>
Sent: Sunday, February 29, 2004 10:17 PM
Subject: [DNA] Best current practice for DNA


> 
> 
> Hi, 
> 
> I'd like people to start thinking as to what's
> best current practice for DNA in IPv6 networks.
> 
> There's a charter milestone on this issue, and
> it will be discussed at the session.
> 
> Please post your ideas beforehand, so that we can
> spend our time as effectively as possible during the session.
> 
> Greg 
> 
>