[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [DNA] L2 link and L3 link

To: Brett Pentland <brett.pentland@eng.monash.edu.au>
Subject: Re: [DNA] L2 link and L3 link
From: Pekka Nikander <pekka.nikander@nomadiclab.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 15:50:45 +0900
Cc: JinHyeock Choi <athene@sait.samsung.co.kr>, Dna <dna@eng.monash.edu.au>
In-reply-to: <4042927A.4020005@eng.monash.edu.au>
References: <BC5073F8.12CDA%alper@docomolabs-usa.com><008201c3fc53$aba83ac0$e92f024b@JinHyeockChoi><Pine.LNX.4.56.0402260829520.6933@internaut.com><003201c3fcc1$1f2a9d40$e92f024b@JinHyeockChoi><403E8379.3090106@eng.monash.edu.au><00be01c3fcc8$4ea8f420$e92f024b@JinHyeockChoi><403E92CC.1090401@eng.monash.edu.au><006701c3fcf3$09801fb0$e92f024b@JinHyeockChoi><4042927A.4020005@eng.monash.edu.au>
Sender: owner-dna@ecselists.eng.monash.edu.au

> Personally I think "Attachment Point" is clear enough and I am in 
> favour of using that term unless someone comes up with a better one, 
> but I am happy to go with something else as long as it's well 
> documented.

I concur.

--Pekka

References:
- Re: [DNA] L2 link and L3 link
  - From: Brett Pentland <brett.pentland@eng.monash.edu.au>

Prev by Date: Re: [DNA] Best current practice for DNA
Next by Date: [DNA] Partial review of draft-jinchoi-dna-goals-00.txt
Prev by thread: Re: [DNA] L2 link and L3 link
Next by thread: [DNA] Renumbering (was something else)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread