[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [DNA] Comments on draft-shim-dna-proactive-00.txt

To: "'Bernard Aboba'" <aboba@internaut.com>
Subject: RE: [DNA] Comments on draft-shim-dna-proactive-00.txt
From: Alper Yegin <alper.yegin@samsung.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2004 02:51:25 -0800
Cc: dna@eng.monash.edu.au
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.56.0403031831460.24868@internaut.com>
Sender: owner-dna@ecselists.eng.monash.edu.au


> > PPP hints...
> 
> Remember that in IPv6, PPP IPv6CP only assigns the Interface
Identifier,
> not the IPv6 address.  So the prefix needs to be obtained via RS/RA.
So
> I'm not clear how the PPP peer obtains a 'hint' from PPP relating to
the
> prefix.
> 
> Or were you thinking of IPv4, where PPP address assignment is handled
in
> IPv4CP?

It seems like we missed this difference between the IPCP and IPv6CP in
the L2 hints draft. Thanks for catching this. 

Alper

References:
- RE: [DNA] Comments on draft-shim-dna-proactive-00.txt
  - From: Bernard Aboba <aboba@internaut.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [DNA] Comments on draft-shim-dna-proactive-00.txt
Next by Date: [DNA] RE: RS/RA Exchange
Prev by thread: RE: [DNA] Comments on draft-shim-dna-proactive-00.txt
Next by thread: Re: [DNA] Comments on draft-shim-dna-proactive-00.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread