Re: [DNA] Best current practice for DNA

[Sathya Narayanan <sathya@research.panasonic.com>]

Hi Syam -
> 00e101c3ff45$d26fe280$7b476c6b@sisodomain.com">
> http://www.thinkonweb.com/sait/MD.pdf
>   
I have a question regarding the results presented in section 6.4 Erroneous
Movement Detection. The report has 0% error rate for the first three schemes.
I was wondering what would happen if RAs or NAs were lost.
  
The following comments apply to the TWO ARs and two APs sharing one ethernet
link setup:
  
RA Beaconing:
Even without the MN moving, if an RA from R1 is lost and R2 responds to the
multicast
RS first, the MN will assume that it moved (will reconfigure itself).
  
3NUD like should do well because of the three retries.
  
1NS and timeout: Will have erroneous MD (and change its configuration) if
the NA is lost and R2 responds to the multicast RS first.
  
please comment,
  
rgds,
Sathya
> 00e101c3ff45$d26fe280$7b476c6b@sisodomain.com">
>
> Thanks,
> Syam
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gregory Daley" <Greg.Daley@eng.monash.edu.au>
> To: <dna@eng.monash.edu.au>
> Sent: Sunday, February 29, 2004 6:47 PM
> Subject: [DNA] Best current practice for DNA> Hi,
> > I'd like people to start thinking as to what's
> > best current practice for DNA in IPv6 networks.
> >       
>
>
> >         
>
> > There's a charter milestone on this issue, and
> > it will be discussed at the session.
> >
> > Please post your ideas beforehand, so that we can
> > spend our time as effectively as possible during the session.
> >
> > Greg
> >           
>