[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [DNA] Best current practice for DNA

To: Sathya Narayanan <sathya@research.panasonic.com>, dna@eng.monash.edu.au
Subject: Re: [DNA] Best current practice for DNA
From: JinHyeock Choi <athene@sait.samsung.co.kr>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 18:05:24 +0900
References: <4ffb6f500124.5001244ffb6f@mail1.monash.edu.au><"00e101c3ff45$d2 6fe280$7b476c6b"@sisodomain.com><405218CE.6090107@Research.Panasonic.COM>
Sender: owner-dna@ecselists.eng.monash.edu.au

Dear Sathya

[omitted]
> I have a question regarding the results presented in section 6.4 Erroneous Movement 
> Detection. The report has 0% error rate for the first three schemes. I was wondering 
> what would happen if RAs or NAs were lost.

There would be error. 

The 0% error rate is the special result under our particular testbed condition. 
We tested those schemes in rather ideal link condition, one MN with little 
contending traffic. If there are multiple MNs with heavy traffic under bad wireless 
condition, we guess there would be problem. 

Best Regards

JinHyeock

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [DNA] Best current practice for DNA
  - From: Sathya Narayanan <sathya@research.panasonic.com>

References:
- [DNA] Best current practice for DNA
  - From: Gregory Daley <Greg.Daley@eng.monash.edu.au>
- Re: [DNA] Best current practice for DNA
  - From: Sathya Narayanan <sathya@research.panasonic.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [DNA] Re: RS/RA Exchange
Next by Date: Re: [DNA] Best current practice for DNA
Prev by thread: Re: [DNA] Best current practice for DNA
Next by thread: Re: [DNA] Best current practice for DNA
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread