Re: [DNA] Best current practice for DNA

[Sathya Narayanan <sathya@research.panasonic.com>]

Dear JinHyeock,

Thanks for the response.

I have a general question about BCP.
Should BCP talk about all possible schemes along with the possibility
of errors (errors leading to unnecessary re-configuration of the interface)
in each scheme 
or should it avoid the ones that have high errors. For example, is it a good
idea to 
mention eager cell switching (with 48% error rate) as part of BCP?

Can somebody please comment?

regards,
Sathya

JinHyeock Choi wrote:
> 018501c40a6c$a7178a20$e82f024b@jinchoe">
> Dear Sathya
>
> [omitted]
> > I have a question regarding the results presented in section 6.4 Erroneous Movement 
> > Detection. The report has 0% error rate for the first three schemes. I was wondering 
> > what would happen if RAs or NAs were lost.
> >     
>
> There would be error. 
>
> The 0% error rate is the special result under our particular testbed condition. 
> We tested those schemes in rather ideal link condition, one MN with little 
> contending traffic. If there are multiple MNs with heavy traffic under bad wireless 
> condition, we guess there would be problem. 
>
> Best Regards
>
> JinHyeock
>