[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [DNA] Re: RS/RA Exchange

To: greg.daley@eng.monash.edu.au, "'Bernard Aboba'" <aboba@internaut.com>
Subject: RE: [DNA] Re: RS/RA Exchange
From: Alper Yegin <alper.yegin@samsung.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 18:30:45 -0800
Cc: "'Erik Nordmark'" <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>, dna@eng.monash.edu.au
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <405645FA.8000104@eng.monash.edu.au>
Sender: owner-dna@ecselists.eng.monash.edu.au

> What's important is that there's either topological
> separation, or authenticated/authorized message exchange.
> I'd guess that if the first isn't available, a mechanism
> for the second would be useful, since it could be used
> to prevent impersonation attacks.

Another simple approach, which seems to be present in many AP products,
is protocol filtering. AP can filter IP packets that are not meant to be
consumed or generated by the hosts connected to the wireless segment.

Alper

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [DNA] Re: RS/RA Exchange
  - From: Greg Daley <greg.daley@eng.monash.edu.au>

References:
- Re: [DNA] Re: RS/RA Exchange
  - From: Greg Daley <greg.daley@eng.monash.edu.au>

Prev by Date: Re: [DNA] Re: RS/RA Exchange
Next by Date: Re: [DNA] Re: RS/RA Exchange
Prev by thread: Re: [DNA] Re: RS/RA Exchange
Next by thread: Re: [DNA] Re: RS/RA Exchange
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread