RE: [DNA] [Announce] DNA in IPv6 Goals I-D Update

["Bound, Jim" <jim.bound@hp.com>]

Has this been posted as IETF ID yet?  I cannot find it?

I still think 2461 is not broken for DNA per arguments on IPv6 WG
previously and will take that position for debate on the mail list.

thanks
/jim 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dna@ecselists.eng.monash.edu.au 
> [mailto:owner-dna@ecselists.eng.monash.edu.au] On Behalf Of 
> JinHyeock Choi
> Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 1:48 AM
> To: Pekka Nikander; Greg Daley
> Cc: Dna
> Subject: [DNA] [Announce] DNA in IPv6 Goals I-D Update
> 
> Dear DNA Group
> 
> We have updated DNA in IPv6 Goals draft. Here are the main changes.
> 
> Firstly we combined the first 4 chapters into 2 like below. 
> 1. Introduction
> 2. Detecting Network Attachment in Existing IPv6 Systems 
> 
> For the other chapters, we just polished sentences without 
> structural change. 
> 
> Secondly, we made several editorial changes according to the 
> feedback. We took into use the term "Attachment Point". 
> But we also used the terms 'link-layer connection' or 
> 'network attachment,' when they seemed more appropriate. 
> 
> This document is available at the URL:
> 
> http://www.thinkonweb.com/sait/draft-jinchoi-dna-goals-01.txt
> 
> We are looking forward to your feedback.
> 
> Best Regards
> 
> JinHyeock Choi and Greg Daley
> (Authors)
> 
> 
> "You know you have reached perfection in design, not when there is 
> nothing more to add, but when there is nothing more to be 
> taken away." 
> - Antoine de Saint-Exupery 
> 
> 
>