RE: [DNA] [Announce] DNA in IPv6 Goals I-D Update

["Bound, Jim" <jim.bound@hp.com>]

Nevermind eyes not working this a.m. I found it.
sorry,
/jim 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bound, Jim 
> Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 7:35 AM
> To: 'JinHyeock Choi'; Pekka Nikander; Greg Daley
> Cc: Dna
> Subject: RE: [DNA] [Announce] DNA in IPv6 Goals I-D Update
> 
> Has this been posted as IETF ID yet?  I cannot find it?
> 
> I still think 2461 is not broken for DNA per arguments on 
> IPv6 WG previously and will take that position for debate on 
> the mail list.
> 
> thanks
> /jim 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-dna@ecselists.eng.monash.edu.au
> > [mailto:owner-dna@ecselists.eng.monash.edu.au] On Behalf Of 
> JinHyeock 
> > Choi
> > Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 1:48 AM
> > To: Pekka Nikander; Greg Daley
> > Cc: Dna
> > Subject: [DNA] [Announce] DNA in IPv6 Goals I-D Update
> > 
> > Dear DNA Group
> > 
> > We have updated DNA in IPv6 Goals draft. Here are the main changes.
> > 
> > Firstly we combined the first 4 chapters into 2 like below. 
> > 1. Introduction
> > 2. Detecting Network Attachment in Existing IPv6 Systems
> > 
> > For the other chapters, we just polished sentences without 
> structural 
> > change.
> > 
> > Secondly, we made several editorial changes according to 
> the feedback. 
> > We took into use the term "Attachment Point".
> > But we also used the terms 'link-layer connection' or 'network 
> > attachment,' when they seemed more appropriate.
> > 
> > This document is available at the URL:
> > 
> > http://www.thinkonweb.com/sait/draft-jinchoi-dna-goals-01.txt
> > 
> > We are looking forward to your feedback.
> > 
> > Best Regards
> > 
> > JinHyeock Choi and Greg Daley
> > (Authors)
> > 
> > 
> > "You know you have reached perfection in design, not when there is 
> > nothing more to add, but when there is nothing more to be 
> taken away."
> > - Antoine de Saint-Exupery
> > 
> > 
> >