RE: [DNA] [Announce] DNA in IPv6 Goals I-D Update

["Bound, Jim" <jim.bound@hp.com>]

DNA,

The Goals and problems stated are good and that is all the draft should
be doing for this effort just state the goals.  I for one do not agree
that RA's are totally not useful and I would like to see all mention of
what the draft think IPv6 ND and IPv6 over Foo link info cannot do
removed from this draft.  Just stick to the goals as we resolve and
achieve the goals there will be plenty of time for technical debate on
what and what does not work for DNA.  I do like the DNA defintion.  So
with the removal of statements what IPv6 does and does not do I would
support a draft that clearly identifies our goals, problems we want to
look at and a course of technical analysis.

I will send more inline comments on the goals as I am able and I think
we need some added too.

Thanks
/jim 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dna@ecselists.eng.monash.edu.au 
> [mailto:owner-dna@ecselists.eng.monash.edu.au] On Behalf Of 
> JinHyeock Choi
> Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2004 1:59 AM
> To: JinHyeock Choi; Pekka Nikander; Greg Daley
> Cc: Dna
> Subject: [DNA] [Announce] DNA in IPv6 Goals I-D Update
> 
> Dear DNA Group
> 
> We have updated DNA in IPv6 Goals draft. The document was 
> reviewed by chairs and accepted as a WG item 
> 
> The draft is available at the URL:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dna-goals-00.txt
> 
> We wish to thank the reviewers, especially Pekka Nikander, 
> for the generous assistance they provided.  
> 
> Your feedback will be highly appreciated. 
> 
> Best Regards
> 
> JinHyeock Choi and Greg Daley
> (Authors)
> 
>  
> 
>