Re: [DNA] [Announce] DNA solution framework I-D

[JinHyeock Choi <athene@sait.samsung.co.kr>]

Hi Brett

Thanks for your kind comments. 

> A few notes:
> 
> It may be worth mentioning the RS implosion problem.  How do we allow 
> nodes to solicit quickly when there is a possibility of synchronzation 
> between multiple nodes. The document talks about one of the tasks being 
> to get an RA quickly, and so dealing with this may be considered to be 
> part of the promlem of getting a fast RA, but maybe it's worth mentioning.

As you guessed, I deemed this is the part of 'Quick RA delivery'. 

 
> I don't agree with the last paragraph of section 4.1.1 regarding the 
> uniquness of link identfiers.
> 
>     "Though, in theory, local uniqueness is sufficient, it may entail
>     several complications.  For simplicity's sake, it may be better to
>     assign a globally unique Link Identifier."
> 
> If the goal of assigning a link identifier is to distinguish between 
> links when movement occurs, then the identifier only needs to be 
> different to the identifiers on links that it is possible to move to 
> directly.  I think that a random identifier of appropriate length is 
> sufficient for this purpose and is simple.  Assigning a truely globally 
> unique identifier would require some kind of registry or central 
> control.  I don't think you would do this "for simplicity's sake".
 
I see your point. We may start a thread on this later. 

Best Regards

JinHyeock