RE: [DNA] [Announce] DNA solution framework I-D

["Bound, Jim" <jim.bound@hp.com>]

The odds of us getting wide agreement on an id of this nature is NULL
IMO.
/jim 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dna@ecselists.eng.monash.edu.au 
> [mailto:owner-dna@ecselists.eng.monash.edu.au] On Behalf Of 
> Brett Pentland
> Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 9:00 PM
> To: Brett Pentland
> Cc: JinHyeock Choi; Erik Nordmark; dna@eng.monash.edu.au; 
> JinHyeock Choi
> Subject: Re: [DNA] [Announce] DNA solution framework I-D
> 
> > sufficient for this purpose and is simple.  Assigning a truely 
> > globally unique identifier would require some kind of registry or 
> > central control.  I don't think you would do this "for 
> simplicity's sake".
> 
> Oops.  I guess address prefixes could be used to come up with 
> a globally unique link identfiers.  Brain not working properly.  :)
> 
> I still think that a random identfier is sufficient and very simple.
> 
> Brett.
>