RE: [DNA] [Announce] DNA solution framework I-D

["Bound, Jim" <jim.bound@hp.com>]

Greg,

Also I am assuming we are going to consider:

 
ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/internet-drafts/draft-jinchoi-dna-cpl-
00.txt

Which is similar to what I suggested too?

> My example from DNAv4 was primarily to illustrate that we'll 
> probably be (happily) stuck with ND for most of our work.

OK.

> 
> I think we'd probably co-operate with DHCWG if there's 
> further work to be done on DNAv4 or IPv4 extensions (since 
> that's where most of the host autoconfiguration expertise for 
> IPv4's now residing).

Note we also did build a unique DHCPv6ID in DHCPv6 we may want to look
at too.

> 
> If there's a need to support devices in a multi-technology 
> Internetwork (v6 and v4) then we'll head down that path.

Agree but that is really a transition issue potentially.

> 
> My personal opinion is that there are clear advantages 
> afforded by IPv6 in this area (SEND being one of the keys), 
> and we should spend most of our time building based on the 
> best possible technology, if we can do it without building 
> air-castles.

Agree but we cannot be in denial about the limitations of IPv4 for this
emerging technology as architects either.

Thanks
/jim
> 
> Greg
> 
>