Re: [DNA] DNA Goals response

[Greg Daley <greg.daley@eng.monash.edu.au>]

Bound, Jim wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> ACK.  Ughhh I will do my best to respond but I am on/off line most of
> July so sporadic.

That's OK, we'll ask JinHyeock to capture the issues
in an issue list and have proposed changes, which
will

> We also need to continue from Bernards DNA Link review.  Two comments
> that stuck in my head from that mail is do we need to have DNA over Foo
> if we do use L2 hints?, and is it worth it from performance view?
> Important questions we will have to answer if we are to mess with Layer
> 1 and 2.  I also am going to ping some IEEE folks I know just out of
> curiosity on the hints for a few of the more common foo's.

OK. The 802.21 group is apparently trying to work
out some general APIs for this, so they'll probably be
looking into some of the same issues.

DNA over foo may be needed, but to some extent we need the DNA
first.

Greg