Re: [DNA] Is 'Link' definition Jason?

[Greg Daley <greg.daley@eng.monash.edu.au>]

Hi JinHyeock,

JinHyeock Choi wrote:
> Dear Greg, Pekka and Carl
> 
> After 'L2 link & L3 link' thread at Feb, it was my understanding that 
> we would use 'link' for L3 link and 'attachment point' for L2 link. 
> I assumed that the link definition issue is settled once and for all.


I think at charter time that there was some original unease
at using these terms but we went ahead saying that if there
was too much confusion we may have to revisit it again.

Let's see what can be done, especially since we've got
an existing terminology document


> Wrong. The issue comes back again and again. It's as if Friday the 13th. 
> You think it is over, then it starts again!
> 
> We need to do something to fix this problem lest there should be more 
> unnecessary confusions. Carl may clarify this in the terminology draft
> or we may give short presentation on it at the meeting. Kindly see to
> that Jason rests in peace. 

We'll see what we're able to do.

With regards to slot scheduling,  we may not have time
for another presentation.

The request for additional slot time was too late (sorry)

we'll just have to get things worked out before the meeting :)

Greg

P.S.  I think you know more pop-culture than I.