Re: [DNA] Terminology choices from DNAv4: [Fwd: [dhcwg] ProposedResolution to DNA Issue 20: Most Likely Point of Attachment]

[JinHyeock Choi <jinchoe@samsung.com>]

Dear Greg

It seems that we are facing Jason again. Kindly find my 
in line comments. 

> Here's an indication of what's being used in DNAv4 for
> terminology.
> 
> It may provide a way to disambiguate the use of 'link'
> as in link-local from the term 'link' as in link-layer,
> which we've gotten into.
> 
> If we describe the L3 entity as an attachment point (
> or point of attachment) and the individual L2 or wireless
> component as a "wireless LAN segment" or cell, we may be
> able to


It seems that you suggest to change terminology. 
It's my impression that you propose to use 
'attachment point' for 'link' and 
'wireless LAN segment or cell' for 'attachment point'. 
Am I right?   

> Of course we'd need to work out whether it is applicable
> to each of our documents, and see if people would like
> to use such terms (and understand them).


Thanks for your effor to keep Jason rest in peace. 

Best Regards

JinHyeock