[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DNA] RE: DNA Goals Issues
Dear Jim
Glad to receive your reply before my departure. :-)
Kindly find my in-line comments.
> > > But of course and one cannot read into email unless it is rude and
> > > best to take it as android discussion in cyberspace.
> >
> > I promise to read your mails even if they are polite.
> > No need to be rude to be read.
>
> Not clear what you mean above. I don't think anyones mail has been
> impolite.
Oops. It seems that I misunderstood the phrase 'one cannot read
into email unless it is rude'. Sorry.
> > First you propose that the parts of Goals drafts be removed
> > and be made a separate draft, if possible.
>
> Yes because they are not goals..
ok
> > The parts to be removed are
> >
> > 1) The second part of Abstract
> >
> > 2) Section 2. DNA in Existing IPv6 Systems
> >
> > 3) Sub-section 3.2. Inadequacies in RA information
>
> Yes.
ok
> > Second you propose as a DNA goal the following three
> > additional items.
> >
> > 4) Investigate a way for a host to attain and retain all prefixes
> > with certainty.
> >
> > 5) Analyze the case of the host hearing both links with respect to
> > seamless mobility
> >
> > 6) Describe the L2 properties with respect to routing and
> > link detection
> > - This may be the work under either link-layer hint or bcp work.
>
> Yes.
ok
> > Thanks for the warning. I will brace myself for that. But I
> > wish people will not dig the settled issues from the grave
> > and restart the thread again. I expect when an issue is over,
> > it's over.
>
> Usually the case but not always.
I wish mine is the USUAL case.
> I think we are done with this thread. Thanks.
I agree. I already posted 'DNA Goals Issue List' at the ML.
(Also I posted a few more about the other issues.)
Thanks for your valuable comments. Looking over the ML, I found out
that you raised the most of issues requiring serious contemplation.
Looking forward to see you soon.
Best Regards
JinHyeock