[DNA] RE: RE: DNA Goals Issues

["Bound, Jim" <jim.bound@hp.com>]

Thanks JinHyeock as I have told Greg and Pekka this is very very
important work for IPv6 deployment. Your persistence and hard work is
clearly appreciated by me and others I am sure.
/jim 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: JinHyeock Choi [mailto:jinchoe@samsung.com] 
> Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 10:14 AM
> To: Bound, Jim
> Cc: ??? ; dna@eng.monash.edu.au 
> Subject: Re: RE: DNA Goals Issues
> 
> Dear Jim
> 
> Glad to receive your reply before my departure. :-) Kindly 
> find my in-line comments. 
> 
> > > > But of course and one cannot read into email unless it 
> is rude and 
> > > > best to take it as android discussion in cyberspace.
> > > 
> > > I promise to read your mails even if they are polite. 
> > > No need to be rude to be read. 
> > 
> > Not clear what you mean above.  I don't think anyones mail has been 
> > impolite.
> 
> Oops. It seems that I misunderstood the phrase 'one cannot 
> read into email unless it is rude'. Sorry. 
> 
> > > First you propose that the parts of Goals drafts be 
> removed and be 
> > > made a separate draft, if possible.
> > 
> > Yes because they are not goals..
> 
> ok
> 
> > > The parts to be removed are
> > > 
> > > 1) The second part of Abstract
> > > 
> > > 2) Section 2. DNA in Existing IPv6 Systems
> > > 
> > > 3) Sub-section 3.2. Inadequacies in RA information
> > 
> > Yes.
> 
> ok
> 
> > > Second you propose as a DNA goal the following three additional 
> > > items.
> > > 
> > > 4) Investigate a way for a host to attain and retain all prefixes 
> > >    with certainty. 
> > > 
> > > 5) Analyze the case of the host hearing both links with 
> respect to    
> > >    seamless mobility
> > > 
> > > 6) Describe the L2 properties with respect to routing and link 
> > > detection
> > > - This may be the work under either link-layer hint or bcp work. 
> > 
> > Yes.
> 
> ok
>  
> > > Thanks for the warning. I will brace myself for that. But I wish 
> > > people will not dig the settled issues from the grave and restart 
> > > the thread again. I expect when an issue is over, it's over.
> > 
> > Usually the case but not always.
> 
> I wish mine is the USUAL case.
> 
> > I think we are done with this thread. Thanks.
> 
> I agree. I already posted 'DNA Goals Issue List' at the ML. 
> (Also I posted a few more about the other issues.) 
> 
> Looking over the ML, I found out that you raised the most of 
> issues requiring serious contemplation. 
> 
> Thanks for your valuable comments and Looking forward to see 
> you at San Diego.
> 
> Best Regards
> 
> JinHyeock 
> 
>