[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[DNA] Re: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-optimistic-dad-01.txt
- To: Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>
- Subject: [DNA] Re: IPv6 WG Last Call:draft-ietf-ipv6-optimistic-dad-01.txt
- From: "Nick 'Sharkey' Moore" <sharkey@zoic.org>
- Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 03:20:45 +1000
- Cc: "JINMEI Tatuya / ?$B?@L@C#:H" <jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp>, dna@eng.monash.edu.au, ipv6@ietf.org
- In-reply-to: <Roam.SIMC.2.0.6.1091022406.21839.nordmark@bebop.france>
- Mail-followup-to: Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>,"JINMEI Tatuya / ?$B?@L@C#:H" <jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp>,dna@eng.monash.edu.au, ipv6@ietf.org
- References: <y7v7jspltp8.wl@ocean.jinmei.org><Roam.SIMC.2.0.6.1091022406.21839.nordmark@bebop.france>
- Sender: owner-dna@ecselists.eng.monash.edu.au
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
On 2004-07-28, Erik Nordmark wrote:
> > > The first unsolicited NA (O=0) is allowed because there are cases
> > > (think predictive handovers) where the router may be buffering
> > > traffic for the MN,
>
> So I think we can leave this part out of optimistic-dad for the time
> being and worry about in the DNA or in the specific case of predictive
> handover.
Yep, no worries. I agree. It's only really there to support
predictive handovers, if they want it they can specify it
themselves :-)
-----Nick