Re: [DNA] Issue 3: Remove Subsection 3.2 - Inadequacies in RAinformation

[Brett Pentland <brett.pentland@eng.monash.edu.au>]

JinHyeock Choi wrote:

>>Hi JinHyeock,
>>
>>JinHyeock Choi wrote:
>>
>>
>>>The set of all the global prefixes assigned to a link can represent a link
>>>identity. But it's not easy for a host to attain and retain all the 
>>>prefixes
>>>with certainty, so the prefix list based DNA scheme needs further
>>>investigation [CPL].
>>
>>This last paragraph seems more like a potential solution than a goal.
>>The set of all the global prefixes assigned to a link can represent
>>a link identity, but there are other ways.  I don't think that the
>>goals document should specify this. I would suggest just removing it.
> 
> 
> The paragraph is intended to present the limitation of prefix list based 
> approach at current stage. It's not my intention to suggest prefix list 
> based approach as the solution.  
> 
The previous paragraph already states that RAs don't necessarily carry a
complete list of prefixes.  This paragraph seems out of place to me.

Brett.