Re: [DNA] WG LC comments on draft-ietf-dna-goals-01.txt

[JinHyeock Choi <jinchoe@samsung.com>]

Pekka

Thanks for kind and helpful comments. 

> > This is a reminder that the WG LC on
> > draft-ietf-dna-goals-01.txt is running and ends on next
> > Monday, Sep 27th.  Please do read the draft, and send your
> > comments to the ML, even if it is "I read it and I think it is good".
> >
> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dna-goals-01.txt
> 
> Overall, I think that the draft is pretty good.  I am sending some
> minor edits directly to the authors.
> 
> What is more considerable, in my opinion, are the following:
> 
>    1. I think we should make clear in the Introduction that
>       we are here only dealing with IPv6.  That is clear from
>       the context, i.e. our charter, but it should also be
>       clearly stated _early_ in the document.  (Or did I just
>       miss it?)

The name of the draft is 'Detecting Network Attachment in 
IPv6 Goals' and I thought that was explicit enough. :-) 

Do you still think we need an additional statement? If so, 
I will add it in the Introduction.  

>    2. I suggest that we add the following paragraph to the
>       beginning of Section 3, just after the section title.
> 
>     The DNA working group has been chartered to define an improved
>     scheme for detecting IPv6 network attachment.  In this section,
>     we define the goals that any such solutions should aim to fulfil.

ok. 

>    3. With regard to goal G10, which currently states that ...
> 
> >      DNA schemes should take into consideration the case where a host
> >      is attached to more than one link at the same time.
> 
>      ... should we add "or multiple times to the same link"?

G10 is about the special case that a host is attached to multiple links 
at the same time and hears different RAs from different links. 

I see few reason to add "or multiple times to the same link". I think 
that's a different case and we may obscure the main issue, 'multiple 
attachment', if we add that.  

Thanks for your kind consideration. 
 
Best Regards

JinHyeock