[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [DNA] Issue about multiply connected to the same link and DNAbeing per-interface or not (was Re: WG LC comments ondraft-ietf-dna-goals-01.txt)

To: Pekka Nikander <pekka.nikander@nomadiclab.com>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Issue about multiply connected to the same link and DNAbeing per-interface or not (was Re: WG LC comments ondraft-ietf-dna-goals-01.txt)
From: Erik Nordmark <erik.nordmark@sun.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 09:43:51 -0700
Cc: JinHyeock Choi <jinchoe@samsung.com>, Dna <dna@eng.monash.edu.au>
In-reply-to: <2E0EE4FA-1057-11D9-9F77-000D9331AFB0@nomadiclab.com>
References: <9C422444DE99BC46B3AD3C6EAFC9711B0766082B@tayexc13.americas.cpqcorp.net><2D999597-0D3B-11D9-A57E-000D9331AFB0@nomadiclab.com><011301c4a1d5$c3742010$e95b024b@jinchoe><E7F315E6-0DFF-11D9-9B24-000D9331AFB0@nomadiclab.com><000e01c4a2f6$505d1ab0$e95b024b@jinchoe><2E0EE4FA-1057-11D9-9F77-000D9331AFB0@nomadiclab.com>
Sender: owner-dna@ecselists.eng.monash.edu.au
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040916)

Pekka Nikander wrote:

> For example, if a host has earlier been connected twice to the
> same link through two different interfaces, and then it detects
> that one of the interfaces has undergone a link change, IMHO that
> is a strong indication that there may have been a link change
> at the other interface, too.

Pekka,
do you have a concrete example where this makes sense?

I don't have a problem relaxing the wording in the goals draft to not 
accidentically preclude optimizations which share information between 
interfaces, but I don't understand your example above.

   Erik

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [DNA] Issue about multiply connected to the same link and DNAbeing per-interface or not (was Re: WG LC comments ondraft-ietf-dna-goals-01.txt)
  - From: Pekka Nikander <pekka.nikander@nomadiclab.com>

References:
- RE: [DNA] Reminder: WG LC on draft-ietf-dna-goals-01.txt is running
  - From: "Bound, Jim" <jim.bound@hp.com>
- [DNA] WG LC comments on draft-ietf-dna-goals-01.txt
  - From: Pekka Nikander <pekka.nikander@nomadiclab.com>
- Re: [DNA] WG LC comments on draft-ietf-dna-goals-01.txt
  - From: JinHyeock Choi <jinchoe@samsung.com>
- Re: [DNA] WG LC comments on draft-ietf-dna-goals-01.txt
  - From: Pekka Nikander <pekka.nikander@nomadiclab.com>
- Re: [DNA] WG LC comments on draft-ietf-dna-goals-01.txt
  - From: JinHyeock Choi <jinchoe@samsung.com>
- [DNA] Issue about multiply connected to the same link and DNA beingper-interface or not (was Re: WG LC comments on draft-ietf-dna-goals-01.txt)
  - From: Pekka Nikander <pekka.nikander@nomadiclab.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [DNA] Issue about multiply connected to the same link and DNAbeing per-interface or not (was Re: WG LC comments ondraft-ietf-dna-goals-01.txt)
Next by Date: RE: [DNA] Reminder: WG LC on draft-ietf-dna-goals-01.txt is running
Prev by thread: Re: [DNA] Issue about multiply connected to the same link and DNAbeing per-interface or not (was Re: WG LC comments ondraft-ietf-dna-goals-01.txt)
Next by thread: Re: [DNA] Issue about multiply connected to the same link and DNAbeing per-interface or not (was Re: WG LC comments ondraft-ietf-dna-goals-01.txt)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread