Re: [DNA] Confirming today's face-to-face meeting decisions

[JinHyeock Choi <jinchoe@gmail.com>]

Dear Pekka
  
Thanks for a summary. I think it adequately sums up the decisions 
of the meeting and is of much help. 

[omitted]
> 1. Link-information draft
> 
> The feeling in the room was that the draft is not quite
> ready.  It requires more work both in explaining its
> applicability and with respect to some specific link
> layer technologies, including 3GPP and 3GPP2.  With
> regard to 802.16, we were informed that the .16 mobility
> spec is not likely to be ready any soon, and therefore it
> may not warrant to include it.  At San Diego people asked
> for an 802.3 section, but so far nobody has volunteered
> to write one.
> 
> As a conclusion, more work is needed on the draft.

ok. 
 
> 2. BCP
> 
> The feeling of the room was that would be useful to have
> two BCP documents, one targeted to host implementors and
> the other one to people that configure networks and routers.
> 
> More work is needed to determine how to proceed in this area.

ok. 
 
> 3. Solutions framework
> 
> We decided to adopt draft-jinchoi-dna-soln-frame-00.txt as
> a working group document, with the intent of publishing
> it as Information.  The idea is that the document provides
> good information to the working group and to the community.
> However, this adoption does not mean that the eventual
> DNA solution must necessarily be based on this framework.
> Right now the framework seems to provide a good starting
> point, but our understanding may evolve.

ok. 
 
> It was left as an open question how fast to proceed with
> the draft.  The chairs suggested of quickly proceeding to
> a WG last call, but some other people thought that it
> might be better to wait for the design team to come up
> with at least some initial ideas before going forward.
> I would encourage people to express their opinions on this.

I am for a quick proceeding. 
 
> 4. Solutions work
> 
> The chairs proposed to set up a design team to work in the
> solutions base.  The consensus in the room was favourable
> to this.  The idea is that the design team would come up
> with an initial design before the next IETF meeting, if
> possible.
> 
> I'll announce the design team membership once it is set up.
> In addition to those that we have currently in mind, it would
> not hurt to have one more person that intends to implement
> the design at the same time as the design team makes progress.

ok

Best Regards

JinHyeock