Re: [DNA] Confirming today's face-to-face meeting decisions

[Vijay Devarapalli <vijayd@iprg.nokia.com>]

Nick 'Sharkey' Moore wrote:
> On 2004-11-10, Vijay Devarapalli wrote:
> 
>>I have a hard time understanding proceedingly quickly with
>>a solution framework document, when we dont have stable
>>solutions (atleast agreed to by the WG) in the WG.
> 
> 
> Hi Vijay,
> 
> 	my point of view is that the solution framework should.
> discuss the techniques available 

my point is have we agreed that we have some techniques
available?

Vijay

> and the situations in which
> they are suitable.  Actual link types would be used as examples
> rather than trying to combine a canonical list of link types.
> 
> 	That way, when someone decides to implement fast
> network attachment on PhlogistonNet or whatever, they
> can go to the informational and say yes: it needs this,
> no: it doesn't need that, etc.
> 
> 	Mind you, I haven't read the document in question 
> lately, and I'm not there in DC, so this comment may be
> rather irrelevant!
> 
> -----Nick in Melbourne