Re: [DNA] Confirming today's face-to-face meeting decisions

[Vijay Devarapalli <vijayd@iprg.nokia.com>]

Erik Nordmark wrote:

> Pekka Nikander wrote:
>  better to wait; I am open to both options.
> 
>> Opinions, please!
>>
>> I'm just trying to keep us making progress and not lag
>> too far behind our milestones; OTOH, it there is a reason
>> it is not that hard to update the milestones.
> 
> 
> Seems like folks are confusing "framework" and "summary" or "overview".
> A framework is the thing you build before you place things into it.
> For instance, you build the supporting structure of a building before 
> you place the wallboards.
> 
> I agree that we can't write a summary or overview document until we know 
> what we end up with, but we should be able to write a framework document 
> which provides the frame into which the puzzle pieces will fit.
> If we can't do that, then we must be fumbling around in the dark.
> 
> So I'm confused why folks think we must wait.

the framework seems to recommend that we need a Link identifier
solution, fast RA, fast RS, optDAD and TSLLAO. it says with this
we have a good DNA solution.

that doesnt seem like a "supporting structure" to me.

maybe I dont understand whats in the framework document.

Vijay