[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[DNA] IPv6 over PPP over GPRS -- once again
> > > > LAPTOP <-- PPP --> PHONE <---- GPRS ----> GGSN
> > > >
> > > > And the same is (obviously) true for UMTS as well...
> > >
> > > => The RAs are sent (at least according to the specs) but what you
> > > might be seeing is that the RA is only sent to the phone and is not
> > > forwarded to the laptop. So the laptop only sees a PPP connection.
> >
> > There is still the question of how the LAPTOP gets the IPv6
> > prefix without
> > RA. Since PPP IPv6CP standards don't specify this, I'm at a loss to
> > explain it.
>
> => It doesn't get the prefix in this model.
> It can only get the prefix if PPP is not there. If, for instance,
> a bluetooth PAN profile is used, then it can get the prefix through
> an RA. The phone would be acting like a router in this case.
>
> Hesham
I thought that there was something wrong with my setup and I came to the conclusion that RAs are indeed sent but I just couldn't see them. However, this was not a correct conclusion either. From the network administrators I learn that RAs never reach the phone because a firewall on their GPRS network side blocks them. I was indeed confused: no RAs and no option in PPP to negotiate a prefix and still the laptop had a global address.
Took awhile to realize that there is a component missing from the picture and that is RADIUS (RADIUS and IPv6 -- rfc3162). Now the setup starts to make sense: the phone gets an address via a PDP context and it's delivered to the phone by using RADIUS. Does this sound reasonable or am I still in error?
BR,
Tero