Re: [DNA] Comments on draft-narayan-dna-hosts-bcp

[Erik Nordmark <erik.nordmark@sun.com>]

Greg Daley wrote:

> Seriously though.  If we're working on the recommendations which
> is there any validity in the structure?

Well, given that my starting list don't even include things like 
"validation of current configuration" and "reachability detection" 
(because I don't see them as necessary for the minimal effective DNA 
BCP), the structure would evolve.

I think the document needs a
  background
  assumptions (which goes into the L2 "link up" hint)
  cookbook (what steps a host goes through, with DAD, MLD, and CPL)
  security considerations
  (optional appendix with design rationale)

> Can we compile a list here on-list (or on an issue-list) and vet
> the concepts before inclusion into the next version?

It makes sense using the mailing list to discuss this.

    Erik