Re: [DNA] Comments on draft-narayan-dna-hosts-bcp

[Sathya Narayanan <sathya@research.panasonic.com>]

Erik -

<snip>
> I do really care about the WG developping a compact set of 
> recommendations, and making them easily understandable for an implementor. But I don't really care who authors which draft or 
> RFC, thus I'm not trying to argue that the CPL draft is the best basis for a BCP.

I will respond to your other comments later. I just wanted to clear any misunderstanding on this aspect. I didn't think you had any such motive about authorship - as I said earlier, I only realized that CPL is the only 'link-change' mechanism in the current BCP only two days ago. So, I am not sure one way or ther other about this right now - I MAY agree with you after some thought. I need to think about your comment "I actually don't see the need for "same link" detection that is separate from CPL's movement detection; it just adds complexity." 

I would like the resulting document to be a really good one ;-) 

thanks,
Sathya