[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [DNA] Last call: Detection of Network Attachment (DNA) in IPv4(fwd)

To: JinHyeock Choi <jinchoe@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Last call: Detection of Network Attachment (DNA) in IPv4(fwd)
From: Bernard Aboba <aboba@internaut.com>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 22:17:46 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: dna@eng.monash.edu.au
In-reply-to: <92e919fb0505251828549f821e@mail.gmail.com>
References: <011201c560e7$b6462790$ed2f024b@jinchoe><Pine.LNX.4.56.0505242318210.13630@internaut.com><92e919fb05052500023ebad2dd@mail.gmail.com><Pine.LNX.4.56.0505250455340.2596@internaut.com><92e919fb0505251828549f821e@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: owner-dna@ecselists.eng.monash.edu.au

> I come to think that we would better use "Point of Attachment"
> because we can't use abbreviation for "Attachment Point" and
> IEEE 802.21 WG is using "PoA" already.

OK.  I will use "Point of Attachment" instead.

References:
- Re: [DNA] Last call: Detection of Network Attachment (DNA) in IPv4(fwd)
  - From: JinHyeock Choi <jinchoe@samsung.com>
- Re: [DNA] Last call: Detection of Network Attachment (DNA) in IPv4(fwd)
  - From: Bernard Aboba <aboba@internaut.com>
- Re: [DNA] Last call: Detection of Network Attachment (DNA) in IPv4(fwd)
  - From: JinHyeock Choi <jinchoe@gmail.com>
- Re: [DNA] Last call: Detection of Network Attachment (DNA) in IPv4(fwd)
  - From: Bernard Aboba <aboba@internaut.com>
- Re: [DNA] Last call: Detection of Network Attachment (DNA) in IPv4(fwd)
  - From: JinHyeock Choi <jinchoe@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [DNA] Definition of "Link Up" and "Link Down" events?
Next by Date: RE: [DNA] Revised terminology section for DNAv4
Prev by thread: Re: [DNA] Last call: Detection of Network Attachment (DNA) in IPv4(fwd)
Next by thread: RE: [DNA] Last call: Detection of Network Attachment (DNA) in IPv4(fwd)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread