[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [DNA] Ideas for ethernet section of draft-ietf-dna-link-information

To: greg.daley@eng.monash.edu.au, dna@eng.monash.edu.au
Subject: RE: [DNA] Ideas for ethernet section of draft-ietf-dna-link-information
From: Alper Yegin <alper.yegin@samsung.com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 13:52:44 -0700
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <421BC12A.70204@eng.monash.edu.au>
Sender: owner-dna@ecselists.eng.monash.edu.au

Greg,

Going back to your 802.3 text....

Reading your text, my understanding is:

- The host MUST learn if the adjacent port is running STP or RSTP.
- The additional delay is 0 if STP/RSTP is not detected. Delay is
learned from the RSTP/STP signaling when present.
- The link up MUST be generated "delay" seconds after
PMA_LINK.indicate(OK).
- The link down MUST be generated immediately after
PMA_LINK.indicate(FAIL).

Is that right?

You text uses "may"s. If you agree, we shall update it with the "MUST"s
as above.

Alper

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [DNA] Ideas for ethernet section of draft-ietf-dna-link-information
  - From: Greg Daley <greg.daley@eng.monash.edu.au>

Prev by Date: [DNA] Feedback on draft-ietf-dna-cpl-00.txt
Next by Date: [DNA] [New I-D] DNA Solution: Link Identifier based approach
Prev by thread: Re: [DNA] Feedback on draft-ietf-dna-cpl-00.txt
Next by thread: Re: [DNA] Ideas for ethernet section of draft-ietf-dna-link-information
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread