[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [DNA] No FastRA unless Landmark? (draft-pentland-dna-protocol-00)

To: Syam Madanapalli <smadanapalli@gmail.com>, Sathya Narayanan <sathya@research.panasonic.com>
Subject: Re: [DNA] No FastRA unless Landmark? (draft-pentland-dna-protocol-00)
From: James Kempf <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 14:04:09 -0700
Cc: greg.daley@eng.monash.edu.au, dna@eng.monash.edu.au
References: <abc03a99a0.a99a0abc03@pintlmail.MITL.Research.Panasonic.COM><10e14db205060107534e9cae40@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: owner-dna@ecselists.eng.monash.edu.au


> The FastRA method should have been a seperate draft, unless we are going
to
> have a single DNA solution.
>

Right, so what is planned on this? Is there going to be a discussion about
whether more than one solution is needed? Whether people want more than one?
Currently, I believe we have two.

                    jak

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [DNA] No FastRA unless Landmark? (draft-pentland-dna-protocol-00)
  - From: Greg Daley <greg.daley@eng.monash.edu.au>
- Re: [DNA] No FastRA unless Landmark? (draft-pentland-dna-protocol-00)
  - From: Erik Nordmark <erik.nordmark@sun.com>

References:
- Re: [DNA] No FastRA unless Landmark? (draft-pentland-dna-protocol-00)
  - From: Sathya Narayanan <sathya@research.panasonic.com>
- Re: [DNA] No FastRA unless Landmark? (draft-pentland-dna-protocol-00)
  - From: Syam Madanapalli <smadanapalli@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [DNA] Comments on DNAv6 (draft-dnadt-dna-protocol-00.txt)
Next by Date: RE: [DNA] Definition of "Link Up" and "Link Down" events?
Prev by thread: Re: [DNA] No FastRA unless Landmark? (draft-pentland-dna-protocol-00)
Next by thread: Re: [DNA] No FastRA unless Landmark? (draft-pentland-dna-protocol-00)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread