Re: [DNA] DNA Protocol vs. Protocol 2

[James Kempf <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>]

Actually, the two documents contain protocols that are designed to solve the
same problem in two completely different ways. So I don't think it is a
matter of merging them, I think one or the other must be chosen.

WG chairs, do you have any thoughts about how the decision on this will be
made? Will we try to make a decision prior to the IETF meeting through
discussion and s concensus call on the list, or do you want to wait until
the meeting and have presentations on each proposal, then a straw poll?

            jak


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Soohong Daniel Park@samsung.com" <soohong.park@samsung.com>
To: "'JinHyeock Choi'" <jinchoe@gmail.com>; <greg.daley@eng.monash.edu.au>
Cc: <dna@eng.monash.edu.au>
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 4:20 AM
Subject: [DNA] DNA Protocol vs. Protocol 2


> Hello folks,
>
> In my understanding, Brett and Jinhyeock documents
> seem to achieve the same goal. I am just curious
> to know of why we need two documents not merged
> one. Is there any internal decision from DT ?
>
> To me, a single document seems mostly like an
> appropriate approach...
>
> Regards,
> ---------------------------------------------
> Daniel (Soohong Daniel Park)
> Mobile Platform Laboratory, SAMSUNG Electronics.
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-dna@ecselists.eng.monash.edu.au
> > [mailto:owner-dna@ecselists.eng.monash.edu.au] On Behalf Of
> > JinHyeock Choi
> > Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2005 9:37 AM
> > To: greg.daley@eng.monash.edu.au
> > Cc: dna@eng.monash.edu.au
> > Subject: [DNA] [New I-D] DNA Solution: Link Identifier based approach
> >
> >
> > Dear DNA Group
> >
> > We submitted the following draft as a solution work.
> >
> > DNA Solution: Link Identifier based approach
> > draft-jinchoi-dna-protocol2-00.txt
> >
> > As Brett mentioned, two approaches were discussed
> > in DT, Landmark based & Link Identifier based.
> >
> > The draft presents the second one and describes how
> > to check for link change with the prefix based linkid.
> >
> > Routers pick the smallest prefix as the linkid prefix and
> > include the linkid prefix in every RA. In short, if a host
> > sees the same linkid prefix, it is at the same link and if it
> > sees a different linkid prefix, it has moved to a new link.
> >
> > This document is available at the URL:
> >
> > http://www.diffeo.com/drafts/draft-jinchoi-dna-protocol2-00.txt
> >
> > We are looking forward to your feedback.
> >
> > Best Regards
> >
> > JinHyeock Choi
> >
> >
>