Re: [DNA] DNA Protocol vs. Protocol 2

To: James Kempf <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>
Subject: Re: [DNA] DNA Protocol vs. Protocol 2
From: Syam Madanapalli <smadanapalli@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 13:22:01 +0530
Cc: "Soohong Daniel Park@samsung.com" <soohong.park@samsung.com>, JinHyeock Choi <jinchoe@gmail.com>, greg.daley@eng.monash.edu.au, dna@eng.monash.edu.au
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com;h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;b=gdjooDUysIslxYmicGzFYoBVKbZqvrZW6rcUaIADzsEPHs8M0CXIBrSQ8/VNuTBZsYD3CY0BC3vyJ1kAXQE+yyN2dhL15y9pc17S2Lh0HiKMWCv7a5Of2NzXSUozts28DwZg/Q1c7bp2/nFYkZqTdcxM+VK/Lgyz+fqxU36Agek=
In-reply-to: <048c01c570f6$85bed8f0$016115ac@dcml.docomolabsusa.com>
References: <000c01c570d3$19842c30$6cc6dba8@daniel><048c01c570f6$85bed8f0$016115ac@dcml.docomolabsusa.com>
Reply-to: Syam Madanapalli <smadanapalli@gmail.com>
Sender: owner-dna@ecselists.eng.monash.edu.au

I think it is better to split the DNAv6 draft into three

1. Link Identification

2. Fast RA

3. DNA Procedure or Operation

This way it is easy to understand and implement. This will also

help WG to better understand about each method that is solving

a particular problem.

-Syam

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [DNA] DNA Protocol vs. Protocol 2
  - From: James Kempf <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>
- Re: [DNA] DNA Protocol vs. Protocol 2
  - From: Brett Pentland <brett.pentland@eng.monash.edu.au>

References:
- [DNA] DNA Protocol vs. Protocol 2
  - From: "Soohong Daniel Park@samsung.com" <soohong.park@samsung.com>
- Re: [DNA] DNA Protocol vs. Protocol 2
  - From: James Kempf <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>