[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DNA] DNA Protocol vs. Protocol 2
Syam Madanapalli wrote:
>> I think it's better as a single document,
>> and if clarity is a problem, then that probably just indicates that
>> the document needs some reorganisation.
>
>
> This just a thought, everybody feels that single document is good, then
> it is fine with me. When I read the DNAv6 first I felt it is very complex,
> as it is solving multiple issues.
>
> And may be we can improve the clarity of the document by reorganisation.
I'm open to suggestions. What sort of reorganization would help?
As it stands, section 3 is an overview and it clearly breaks the problem
down into separate sections:
3. Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.1 What Identifies a Link? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.2 Link Identification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.3 Fast Router Advertisment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Section 5 goes into the details of what each device has to do to solve
both problems:
5. DNA Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
5.1 DNA Router Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
5.1.1 Data Structures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
5.1.2 Router Configuration Variables . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
5.1.3 Bootstrapping DNA Data Structures . . . . . . . . . . 13
5.1.4 Processing Router Advertisements . . . . . . . . . . . 13
5.1.5 Processing Router Solicitations . . . . . . . . . . . 13
5.1.6 Complete Router Advertisements . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
5.1.7 Scheduling Fast Router Advertisements . . . . . . . . 15
5.1.8 Scheduling Unsolicited Router Advertisements . . . . . 16
5.2 DNA Host Operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
5.2.1 Data Structures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
5.2.2 Selection of a Landmark Prefix . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
5.2.3 Sending Router Solicitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
5.2.4 Processing Router Advertisements . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Is this general structure ok (just needing some reorganization within
sections)?
Brett.