[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [DNA] DNA Protocol vs. Protocol 2

> >    3.  Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
> >      3.1   What Identifies a Link?  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
> >      3.2   Link Identification  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
> >      3.3   Fast Router Advertisment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  7
>
> Can we describe these 2 completely in this sections? Meaning, can we
> for example, just replace the Link Identification method with some other
> approach?
>

No, I think the protocol needs one link identification method. That means,
as difficult and painful as it may seem to the WG, we need to choose between
the two drafts.

            jak